Sunday, July 31, 2005

The movie that finally made people stop asking "Do you mean 'artistic?'": "Rain Man"

Perfect example of why every home absolutely should have access to Turner Classic Movies. As John Kerry might ask, "Who among us has not seen 'Rain Man?'" But when you can catch a classic like this without commercials and in widescreen ... well, that's watching a movie, my friend.

Especially a movie that really delivers with the two lead performances. Everyone and his brother knows about Dustin Hoffman and how his portrayal of autistic savant Raymond Babbitt brought home the Oscar. And hey, it's hard to argue with that even after a dozen viewings. But allow me what the kids call a "shout-out" to Mr. Tom Cruise, who played Ray's younger brother Charlie and not only knocked it out of the park but sent that mother flying into the stratosphere.

You know the story, so no need to recap. In a way, Hoffman might have had the easier role. I mean, his Raymond is supposed to be simple and an insane creature of habit. No question that Hoffman fully inhabited the role and showed few, if any, cracks in his autistic armor. There's a reason why almost everyone has babbled "Sally Dibbs" or "about a hundred dollars" or "I'm definitely not wearing my underwear" at one time or another.

It's a lot harder to ape Charlie Babbitt, and that's due to his character being a hell of a lot more complex. We first meet Charlie as some hotshot luxury car salesman, and he remains a first-class prick for more than an hour ... hell, 90 minutes. But it's clear he has an ax to grind with his dead father, and that he's having a hard time wrapping his mind around the whole autistic brother thing.

That's what makes his coming to terms with the situation all the more gripping, and Cruise handles this incredibly well, especially considering he was what ... 25 or 26 at the time? Name one twentysomething actor today who could have pulled this off as well. Leo's too old. So is Christian Bale. Who else? Jake Gyllenhaal? Orlando Bloom? Really, I want to know. Between the intense anger early on and sad recognition/acceptance near the end, Cruise killed this role. It's mind-boggling that Hoffman actually was the original choice, or that when he took the Raymond role, he wanted Bill Murray to play Charlie. ("Gunga galunga, Ray ... gunga, gunga-galunga.")

Of course, for me and many others, the money scene is when the brothers get to Las Vegas. Watching them descend the escalator in their new suits ... you just knew they were getting ready to do some damage. I think of that every time I go to Vegas, even when I drive. You see, Dad lets me drive slow on the driveway every Saturday. I'm an excellent driver ...

4 Comments:

At 2:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Couldn't agree more about Tom Cruise in this role. In fact, Cruise has played some some great roles next to some Hollywood giants and held his own while they've gotten the kudos. In addition to Rainman (Hoffman got the Oscar), there was the Color of Money (Newman got the Oscar), A Few Good Men (Nicholson was nominated), and of course Cocktail (I think Bryan Brown won the Oscar but I'm not sure). Hell, even Cuba Gooding Jr pulled in a best supprorting Oscar in Jerry Maguire.

 
At 2:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal might have been okay. And, as much as I hate to say it, Ryan Gosling might have been able pull off the role.

 
At 3:52 PM, Blogger Jefferson said...

I could go along with Gosling if not for "The Notebook," which I haven't seen because ... well, I have a penis.

And good point on Cruise being wingman to Oscar winners. Why Curtis "Booger" Armstrong never got a supporting actor nom for "Risky Business" is beyond me.

 
At 4:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's true. Not even an incredibly hot Rachel McAdams can improve the Notebook.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home